A commercial truck manufacturer wanted to develop an off-road mileage accumulation course for its vehicles that was:

Equivalent to a course currently in use (in terms of damage and which subsystems or components were exercised to failure) ;
Cheaper to run than the current course;
Shorter than the current course but not more severe.

A SixD engineer worked with the client's technical team to develop and implement a multi-step program to achieve this goal, which involved:

  1. Identifying all road surface types in the existing course
     

  2. Running an instrumented mule over the course under various load conditions and at various speeds. Data was used to analyze road surfaces for damage accumulated per mile and determine the spectral damage content.
     

  3. Surveying the prospective site for road surfaces that matched the original.
     

  4. Running the instrumented mule over a candidate course to identify segments that excited the vehicle in the same way as the original course.
     

  5. Combining candidate road segments that (a) were as damaging overall as the original course, (b) were located reasonably close to each other, and (c) could be covered in several consecutive work shifts.

Benefit:  A satisfactory equivalent course was identified within a month of the first mule test. The new course cut in half the number of miles required to achieve the desired damage levels, shaving time and cost from the testing process.